|
PolyPhen Help Appendix: data used for calculation of structural parameters |
| Ala | Arg | Asn | Asp | Cys | Gln | Glu | Gly | His | Ile | Leu | Lys | Met | Phe | Pro | Ser | Thr | Trp | Tyr | Val |
| 103 | 234 | 160 | 164 | 105 | 181 | 187 | 87 | 170 | 133 | 137 | 197 | 157 | 169 | 133 | 125 | 139 | 195 | 181 | 120 |
| Ala | Arg | Asn | Asp | Cys | Gln | Glu | Gly | His | Ile | Leu | Lys | Met | Phe | Pro | Ser | Thr | Trp | Tyr | Val |
| 88 | 173 | 114 | 111 | 108 | 144 | 138 | 60 | 153 | 167 | 167 | 168 | 163 | 190 | 112 | 89 | 116 | 227 | 193 | 140 |
Accessible surface propensities:
Reference: Sunyaev et al., Are knowledge-based potentials derived from protein structure
sets discriminative with respect to amino acid types? (1998) Proteins 31:225-246
[Abstract] [PDF format]
| AA | Normed accessible surface area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | (0..5) | [5..15) | [15..30) | [30..50) | [50..75) | >=75 | |
| Ala | 0.59 | 0.06 | -0.03 | -0.2 | -0.23 | -0.18 | 0.18 |
| Arg | -2.99 | -1.14 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.25 | -0.31 |
| Asn | -1.48 | -0.55 | -0.27 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.45 | 0.39 |
| Asp | -1.35 | -0.69 | -0.33 | 0.1 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.5 |
| Cys | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.51 | -0.02 | -0.75 | -1.8 | -2 |
| Gln | -1.55 | -0.58 | -0.25 | 0.06 | 0.4 | 0.44 | -0.17 |
| Glu | -2.13 | -0.98 | -0.35 | -0.01 | 0.4 | 0.58 | 0.28 |
| Gly | 0.31 | -0.23 | -0.07 | -0.21 | -0.12 | 0.05 | 0.68 |
| His | -1.09 | -0.11 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.1 | -0.18 | -0.54 |
| Ile | 0.87 | 0.54 | 0.09 | -0.04 | -0.79 | -1.29 | -2 |
| Leu | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.28 | -0.11 | -0.76 | -1.21 | -1.42 |
| Lys | -4.06 | -2.28 | -1.22 | -0.08 | 0.6 | 0.75 | 0.39 |
| Met | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.01 | -0.11 | -0.4 | -1.17 | -0.62 |
| Phe | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.36 | -0.01 | -0.86 | -1.31 | -1.75 |
| Pro | -0.98 | -0.46 | -0.28 | -0.03 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 0.74 |
| Ser | -0.29 | -0.21 | 0.04 | -0.11 | -0.01 | 0.21 | 0.49 |
| Thr | -0.49 | -0.16 | -0.11 | 0.1 | 0.23 | 0.09 | -0.15 |
| Trp | -0.29 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.19 | -0.52 | -1.42 | -2.54 |
| Tyr | -0.76 | 0.27 | 0.53 | 0.43 | -0.22 | -0.95 | -1.87 |
| Val | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.19 | -0.13 | -0.46 | -1.13 | -1.76 |
Phi-Psi map (Ramachandran map) regions:
(The map is adapted from ProCheck software definitions.)
bBBBBBBBBBBbbbbb.....pppppgggggbbbbb bBBBBBBBBBBBbbbbb......ggggggggbbbbb bBBBBBBBBBBBbbbbbbb....ggggggggbbbbb bbBBBBBBBBBBBbbbbbb....ggggggggbbbbb bbBBBBBBBBBBBBbbbbb....ggggggggbbbbb bbBBBBBBBBBBBbbbbbb....gggggggggbbbb bbbBBBBBBBBBbbbbbbb...llllllgggggbbb bbbbBBBBBBBbbbbbbbblllllllllgggggbbb bbbbbBbbBbbbbbbbbbblllllllllgggggbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbblllllllllgggggbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbblllllllllgggggbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb....llllllllllggggbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb....llllllllllggggbbb aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....llllLlllllggggbbb aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....llllLLllllggggbbb aaaaaaaAaaaaaaaa...llllllllllggggbbb aaaaaaAAAAaaaaaaa...lllllllllggggbbb aaaaaaAAAAAaaaaaa...lllllllllggggbbb aaaaaAAAAAAAaaaaaa..lllllllllggggbbb aaaaaaAAAAAAAaaaaaa.lllllllllggggbbb aaaaaaAAAAAAAAaaaaa.lllllllllggggbbb aaaaaaaAAAAAAAaaaaaa....gggggggggbbb aaaaaaaaAAAAAAAaaaaa...ggggggggggbbb aaaaaaaaaAAAAAAaaaaaa..ggggggggggbbb aaaaaaaaaaaAAAAaaaaaa..ggggggggggbbb aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..ggggggggggbbb aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.gggggggggggbbb .aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.gggggggggggggg gggaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..gggggggggggggg gggbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.....gggggggggggggg bbbbbbbbbbbbbb.......pppppgggggggggg bbbbbbbbbbbbbb.......pppppgggggggggg bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb......ppPpppggggggggg bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb......ppPpppggggggbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb......ppPPppggggggbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb......ppppppggggggbbb |
Ligands excluded from contact calculation:
(See also [Current Het Group Dictionary] at
[PDB])
| PO4 | PI | SO4 | SUL | CL | BR | NO3 | SCN | NH4 | K | NA | LI | MG | DOD | NAG | MAN | GOL | SO4 | CL | CO3 | FS4 |
Importance of contact evaluation in all related protein structures:
The figure below is from
Shamil Sunyaev, Vasily Ramensky, Ina Koch, Warren Lathe III, Alexey S. Kondrashov and Peer Bork
Prediction of deleterious human alleles
[Hum Mol Genet] (2001) 10:591-597
[PDF format]
![]() |
Figure 2. In some cases our straightforward rules fail to predict the deleterious effect of an amino acid substitution; however, more detailed analysis is capable of revealing the damaging character of the mutation. This suggests that further improvement of the method can significantly reduce the fraction of false-negative predictions. As an example, structural analysis (PDB entry 2pab) predicts the Ile->Ser replacement in transthyretin that causes amyloidosis type II to be a neutral substitution, because this is a substitution of a hydrophobic residue for a hydrophilic one on the surface, distant from the thyroid hormone binding site. (A). Comparative analysis also fails to detect the deleterious effect of the mutation because transthyretin from Sparus aurata (Gilthead sea bream) has a Ser residue in the corresponding site, probably as a result of a correlated mutation (B). However, analysis of the structure of the complex of transthyretin with the retinol binding protein (PDB entry 1qab) shows a critical role of the Ile residue for the complex formation (C). |